Crypto casino transparency ranking
How much of each operator can be checked by someone other than the operator. Every component is a fact about the public record — identifiable wallets, observable reserves, a stated licence, a reachable contact, independent review coverage, and whether on-chain volume holds together. Nothing here says an operator is safe or solvent, and reserve size is not scored.
60 operators scored · rebuilt continuously · embeddable badges · for comparison sites · JSON / CSV · methodology
| # | Operator | Score | Verifiability | Weakest link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gamdom | 94 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 2 | Shuffle | 94 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 3 | BitStarz | 92 | Highly verifiable | Multi-chain activity mapped |
| 4 | 1xBet | 91 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 5 | BC.Game | 90 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 6 | Rainbet | 90 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 7 | Stake | 90 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 8 | BetFury | 89 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 9 | Cloudbet | 89 | Highly verifiable | Complaint record public |
| 10 | Spartans | 89 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 11 | Wager | 89 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 12 | Betstrike | 87 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 13 | Chips.gg | 87 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 14 | Duelbits | 87 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 15 | Whale.io | 87 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 16 | ToshiBet | 85 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 17 | AceBet | 84 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 18 | Goated | 84 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 19 | MonkeyTilt | 84 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 20 | Packdraw | 84 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 21 | Coincasino | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 22 | Degen | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 23 | Dicey | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 24 | Duel | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 25 | MetaWin | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 26 | Razed | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 27 | Roobet | 82 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 28 | Solcasino | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 29 | Sportsbet.io | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 30 | Thrill | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 31 | Yeet | 82 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 32 | Crypto.games | 81 | Highly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 33 | Betplay | 80 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 34 | Bluff.com | 80 | Highly verifiable | Publicly reachable |
| 35 | 500 Casino | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 36 | CasinoBet | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 37 | CSGOEmpire | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 38 | Degen City | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 39 | HypeDrop | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 40 | Rollbit | 77 | Mostly verifiable | On-chain volume consistent |
| 41 | Stake US | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 42 | Winna | 77 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 43 | CSGOWin | 75 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 44 | Bitsler | 74 | Mostly verifiable | Licence disclosed |
| 45 | Betchain | 72 | Mostly verifiable | Licence disclosed |
| 46 | Betpanda | 72 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 47 | Clash.gg | 72 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 48 | Qzino | 72 | Mostly verifiable | Licence disclosed |
| 49 | Bovada | 71 | Mostly verifiable | Licence disclosed |
| 50 | Dustbit | 71 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 51 | Bitcasino.io | 69 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 52 | Housebets | 69 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 53 | Jack | 69 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 54 | Gamba | 67 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 55 | Rain.gg | 67 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 56 | Moonroll | 65 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 57 | Shock | 65 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 58 | Biggest withdrawal | 64 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 59 | LuckyFun | 64 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
| 60 | Moon | 64 | Mostly verifiable | Independent review coverage |
How the score is built
Eight components, weighted: identifiable on-chain wallets (30), observable reserves (15), independent review coverage (15), disclosed licence (10), public reachability (10), on-chain volume consistency (10), multi-chain mapping (5), public complaint record (5). The score is the share of the available weight earned, expressed out of 100.
Two deliberate choices. Reserve size is not scored — a small operator that publishes everything outscores a large one that hides, because this measures disclosure and not wealth. And review coverage counts sources, not ratings — being assessed by four platforms scores higher than being assessed by none, however favourable the verdicts.
If your operator scores low
Every component lists what would raise it, and none of them involve paying us — there is nothing to buy here and no placement for sale. The single highest-impact change is publishing your deposit and treasury addresses, which moves the 30-point component and usually the reserve and chain components with it. The quickest way is a text file on your own domain: claim your addresses → (no private key, no account). Prefer to send them privately, or fix something else? Use the submission form.
This measures how much of an operator can be independently verified today — not whether it is safe, solvent or legal, which we never assert. A low score can mean the operator discloses little, or that we have not yet mapped it; both are fixed the same way, by publishing addresses. Reserve size is deliberately not scored, only whether reserves can be checked at all.
Methodology & disclaimer. Figures are derived from on-chain transfers attributed to wallets we associate with each operator, plus third-party ratings shown with their source. Blockchain attribution carries inherent uncertainty, and reserves are an all-chain best-effort estimate from mapped wallets — coverage varies by operator. These pages describe observed activity and third-party data only; they are not an endorsement of any operator and not a statement on any operator's solvency, legality, fairness, or safety, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice. See how we attribute on-chain activity · about us · report a correction. Data updates roughly every 30 minutes. 18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — see responsible gambling resources.
Cite this page. Tekel Data, “Crypto Casino Transparency Ranking — What Can Actually Be Verified”, 2026-08-28, https://tekeldata.com/rankings/transparency — figures are on-chain observations as of that date and change as the chains do. Reuse permitted with attribution (CC BY 4.0). Machine-readable: markdown · MCP · llms.txt.