Dicey vs Gamdom
A neutral, data-led comparison of Dicey and Gamdom — independent trust ratings, observed on-chain volume and mapped reserves, side by side.
Updated continuously from indexed on-chain data and third-party ratings.
| Metric | Dicey | Gamdom |
|---|---|---|
| Blended trust (0–100) | 73 | 88 |
| casino.guru Safety (/10) | 7.3 | 9.8 |
| AskGamblers expert (/10) | — | — |
| Trustpilot (/5) | — | — |
| 7d on-chain volume | $3.6M | $36.0M |
| Mapped reserves | $7.2M | $5.7M |
| Active counterparties (7d) | 259 | 5,740 |
| Chains tracked | 2 | 3 |
On our recommended metric — a blend of independent third-party trust ratings — Gamdom currently scores higher (88 vs 73 / 100). On-chain volume differences are shown for context only and are not a quality signal — volume is easily inflated by wash trading.
FAQ
On Tekel Data's recommended metric — a blend of independent third-party trust ratings (casino.guru, Trustpilot, AskGamblers) — Gamdom currently scores higher (88 vs 73 out of 100). Both are compared on the same public signals, and the figures update continuously — see the live table on this page.
No. On-chain volume is easily inflated by wash trading, so Tekel Data never treats it as a quality signal — it is shown for context only, and any operator whose volume shows a wash/treasury pattern is held "under review" and not rendered as a comparable figure. Compare on independent trust and verifiable on-chain reserves instead.
Both operators are placed side by side on the same public, verifiable signals: a 0–100 blended trust score (casino.guru + Trustpilot + AskGamblers), observed on-chain reserves summed across every mapped chain, and churn-excluded activity. Everything is measured from public data and updates roughly every 30 minutes.
Full profiles
See the full trust ranking (our recommended ordering — not volume), or how the blended score is built in the methodology.
Methodology & disclaimer. Figures are derived from on-chain transfers attributed to wallets we associate with each operator, plus third-party ratings shown with their source. Blockchain attribution carries inherent uncertainty, and reserves are an all-chain best-effort estimate from mapped wallets — coverage varies by operator. These pages describe observed activity and third-party data only; they are not an endorsement of any operator and not a statement on any operator's solvency, legality, fairness, or safety, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice. See how we attribute on-chain activity · about us · report a correction. Data updates roughly every 30 minutes. 18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — see responsible gambling resources.
Cite this page. Tekel Data, “Dicey vs Gamdom — Crypto Casino Comparison”, 2026-08-27, https://tekeldata.com/compare/dicey-vs-gamdom — figures are on-chain observations as of that date and change as the chains do. Reuse permitted with attribution (CC BY 4.0). Machine-readable: markdown · MCP · llms.txt.