How crypto casino wallets are attributed
A trust-data site should show its work. We attribute 3,292 casino wallets to 118 named operators — and here is exactly what evidence stands behind each, by class.
Every address is independently verifiable on its chain's block explorer. The full wallet set, evidence types and methodology are published for audit in our open-data repository (GitHub).
| Evidence class | Wallets | Operators | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioural clustering (common-input-ownership) | 2,034 | 7 | Expanded from a confirmed seed address; heuristic, not proof. |
| Block-explorer name-tags + confirmed deposits | 1,022 | 114 | Strongest public evidence — the operator tag is visible on the address page itself. |
| Public label sets (Dune institution labels) | 236 | 14 | Curated public labels, cross-checked before import. |
Seed vs derived — and what we exclude
Wallets carrying direct public evidence (a block-explorer name-tag, a public label set, a confirmed deposit) are seed wallets. Wallets reached by expanding a seed through common-input-ownership clustering are derived — they inherit a brand only because the seed evidence is strong. Casino-like wallets we cannot tie to a named operator stay unattributed and are excluded from every verified figure — never guessed into a brand. Known non-casino infrastructure (DEX routers, settlement contracts) is explicitly denylisted so a mis-tag can't inflate any operator.
Why this matters
Most "on-chain casino" numbers are unfalsifiable — you're asked to trust a dashboard. Ours are the opposite: pick any wallet, open it on a block explorer, and check the balance and flow yourself. That verifiability is the entire point, and it's why we publish the exact rules and thresholds behind every figure. See also how on-chain tracking works and the attribution methodology.
FAQ
Tekel Data attributes 3,292 wallets to 118 named operators using tiered public evidence: block-explorer name-tags and confirmed deposits (strongest), public label sets, entity-intelligence leads, and behavioural common-input-ownership clustering expanded from confirmed seed addresses. Every address is independently verifiable on its chain's block explorer.
Casino-like wallets that cannot be tied to a named operator stay unattributed and are excluded from every verified figure — they are never guessed into a brand. Known non-casino infrastructure (DEX routers, settlement contracts) is explicitly denylisted so a mis-tag cannot inflate any operator.
Yes. The full wallet set, evidence classes and exact rules and thresholds are published openly on GitHub under CC BY 4.0. Anyone can open any attributed address on a block explorer and re-check its balance and flow.
Explore
Methodology & disclaimer. Figures are derived from on-chain transfers attributed to wallets we associate with each operator, plus third-party ratings shown with their source. Blockchain attribution carries inherent uncertainty, and reserves are an all-chain best-effort estimate from mapped wallets — coverage varies by operator. These pages describe observed activity and third-party data only; they are not an endorsement of any operator and not a statement on any operator's solvency, legality, fairness, or safety, and nothing here is financial, legal or investment advice. See how we attribute on-chain activity · about us · report a correction. Data updates roughly every 30 minutes. 18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — see responsible gambling resources.
Cite this page. Tekel Data, “How Crypto Casino Wallets Are Attributed — Evidence & Coverage 2026”, 2026-08-27, https://tekeldata.com/data/crypto-casino-wallet-attribution — figures are on-chain observations as of that date and change as the chains do. Reuse permitted with attribution (CC BY 4.0). Machine-readable: markdown · MCP · llms.txt.